Bug’s Posts

Can I call this meso-blogging? 

You should have been in pictures

The best part of Posterous is being able share more of Ray with the world. 

Begin forwarded message:

From: "Raymond Peterson"
Date: August 20, 2008 12:10:41 PM PDT
Subject: You should have been in pictures

You thought it was gone.. you thought the man could keep the chaotic one checked…  fear not..

Once again the if you were lists rides the electronic currents…

What star would this developer be?

1.                   Robin Verduijn

a.       Colin Farrell

2.                   Chris Johnson

a.       Martin Short

3.                   John Knight

a.       Jeff Goldblum

4.                   Bob Alcorn

a.       Simon Pegg

5.                   Jeff Bradley

a.       David Duchovny

6.                   Reidy Brown

a.       Tina Fey

7.                   Eric Denman

a.       Matthew modine

8.                   David Carter

a.       Powers Booth

9.                   Dan Rinzel

a.       Tim Robbins

10.                Ramsey Shehadeh

a.       Robert Downey Jr.

11.                Raymond Peterson

a.       Wesley Snipes

dy>

Loading mentions Retweet

Comments [0]

Ray's Academy

[ 10:45am ] madhatter : for the record.. (and in challenge of alcornian opinion) heath ledger performed well as the joker but does not deserve an academy award
[ 10:45am ] bug_laptop : booooo
[10:45am]bug_laptop:boooooo
[10:45am]dan2bit:how about a magic trick
[10:45am]true_gritt_wfh:Egads, he challenged Alcornian doctrine!
[10:45am]madhatter:you may boo... but the character does not change
[10:45am]true_gritt_wfh:Infidel!
[10:46am]madhatter:he gets props for consistency...  but c'mon
[10:46am]bug_laptop:ray, given that there are still 4 months left in the year, and academy award fodder not completely out yet, i ask who your 5 nominees for best supporting actor are then
[10:46am]madhatter:"i want my phone call"
[10:46am]bug_laptop:(magic trick)++
[10:46am]madhatter:heh... #5.. all the plans in "the happening"
[10:46am]madhatter:s/plans/plants
[10:47am]bug_laptop:should i dekarma  ray for a bad joke about ledger having less acting ability currently than plants?
[10:47am]bug_laptop:something something pushing up daisies?
[10:47am]madhatter:lessee... supporting actor could be in No Country For Old Men
[10:47am]madhatter:or "there will be blood"
[10:48am]bug_laptop:ray, i think you're a year late on those
[10:48am]madhatter:y;ah?
[10:48am]madhatter:whoops
[10:48am]madhatter:lemme do my research and provide a proper list..
[10:48am]bug_laptop:DDL did in fact win an award for TWBB
[10:48am]bug_laptop:thank you 
[10:48am]bug_laptop:and supporting actor did go to NCFOM
[10:49am]bug_laptop:also, ftw
[10:49am]bug_laptop:(Alcornian Doctrine)++
[10:49am]robin:http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/7569484.stm
[10:50am]bug_laptop:ha: Imperial Fleet Week
[10:50am]bug_laptop:http://current.com/items/89204971_death_star_over_san_francisco
[10:50am]madhatter:No country for old men came in 2008
[10:50am]dan2bit:hahaha (undercutting your own credibility as an academy award judge by renominating last year's winners)++
[10:50am]madhatter:feh.. it's listed..
[10:50am]madhatter:and i'm old
[10:50am]madhatter:so there
[10:50am]MxYzPtLk:so there are more problems than the scr dictates?
[10:50am]bug_laptop:http://oscar.com/oscarnight/winners/index
[10:51am]madhatter:shite... my website sucks
[10:50am]bug_laptop:And for the record, I would easily put Ledger up against Bardem for BSA
[10:51am]madhatter:feh
[10:52am]bug_laptop:Now, he prob. wouldn't win there given the whole "dead" thing, but were he alive?
[10:52am]bug_laptop:it would be close, i say
[10:52am]true_gritt_wfh:I might have to 'feh' that statement too, bug
[10:52am]true_gritt_wfh:in fact...
[10:52am]true_gritt_wfh:feh
[10:52amTopic changed to "madhatter stuck in 2007" by dan2bit.
[10:52am]bug_laptop:wait, true_gritt, you don't think, given a living ledger, that he would be up there with bardem?
[10:53am]true_gritt_wfh:I think Ledger's performance in Batman is worth a nomination nod, dead or alive, but I think Bardem's performance in No Country For Old Men was better.
[10:54am]true_gritt_wfh:Although I'd take the Joker in a Joker vs Anton Chigurh cage match.
[10:54am]bug_laptop:so put TDK in 2007, and would you drop someone from affleck, hoffman, holbrook and wilkinson to add ledger?
[10:54am]bug_laptop:i would think you would have to
[10:55am]madhatter:for BSA.. i'd look for Michael Clayton on the shortlist
[10:55am]bug_laptop:DUDE
[10:55am]MxYzPtLk:sweet
[10:55am]madhatter:provided i got the year right
[10:55am

Loading mentions Retweet

Comments [0]

For Denman and #hugs

Plus, it gives everyone an amusing photo of Gilfus.

The things we do for attention when 20 boggle the mind.

Loading mentions Retweet

Comments [1]

While I'm sure its a 'marketing' thing ...

Its amusing to have a founder of the company I'm now using as my meso-blogging service following my admittedly rambling and mostly incoherent posts about how I'm trying to manage my life :) Eventually, maybe, there may even be something useful here.

Hi Garry, welcome to my emails that seem to go on forever.

BTW, totally digging not having to pull up a browser when writing from the phone. Thx.

Sent from my iPhone

Loading mentions Retweet

Comments [2]

Mail.app Rules and Bug's GTD. Also, some repetition.

I never read the GTD book. And I really don't care. The whole context/project/etc. stuff always seemed too complicated, and while I'm sure iGTD and Yojimbo do wonders for the disciples, I'm looking for simpler.

So I use Things. More on this later.

I have adopted some personal conventions around tagging and projects in MailTags, though: To-Do tags start with an @. @action, @hold, etc. As mentioned previously, there are five of these I commonly use: @action, @hold, @respond, @review and @waiting. I've also got @archive, but haven't used that in a while, and it'll get purged at some point. YMMV. Use the words you think in.

Then there are the location-based tags: these (following Twitter convention, unlike my @ tags, start with a #). #bay area, #dc, etc. Finally, I've got my project tags. In MailTags, these actually ARE projects, but they still all start with a ~. ~3303 water street sale. ~6036 contra costa rd move. etc. Projects can get colors, and I find that easy to sort them with, although all projects get a smart mailbox, as well as an address book group. Not a calendar yet, though, as iCal has no good ways to archive off old calendars.

Then there are the Mail Act-On rules. There are at least 6:

* a: Tag as @action
* h: Tag as @hold
* r: Tag as @respond
* v: Tag as @review
* w: Tag as @waiting

The sixth is because the latest betas of Act-On didn't differentiate between keystroke case, so I had to set up a c: Clear all tags. I believe this is rectified, so I'm going back to having 5 counterparts to the above rules:

* A: Untag as @action
* H: Untag as @hold
* R: Untag as @respond
* V: Untag as @review
* W: Untag as @waiting

Ok, before getting back to Mail rules, onto Address Book groups. As I said, each project gets a group, and therefore can have a rule with it. Each #location gets a group, and can therefore have a rule with it. And then there's groups for various Spam, Bacn and @tag addresses.

For instance, I get a lot of crapmail from HR. I don't usually care about it. Therefore, there's an HR address in my address book with all the useless aliases they send from, and that card gets added to my spam: blackboard group. Ditto automated nightly emails from the 10000 test servers we run.

The Bacn groups, like bacn: jira, or bacn: wine, or bacn: @review exist so that things that I care about, but not on a deeply personal, emotional level, can get tagged and moved out of the Inbox. Again, use your own labels. bacn: @waiting is a good one if you add the order-received@amazon.com and order-shipped@amazon.com addresses, so you can track your orders without having them interrupt you. You can be as complicated as you want.

OK, finally, back to Mail.app rules:

Most of the hard work is done at this point. Just set up a mail rule for each of the groups you spent all that time laboriously sorting out, and have each rule have a condition: "Sender is member of group: bacn: wine" perform the following actions: "Move Message to Zenbox; Set Color of background to Red; Set MailTags Keyword Add wine"

For project rules, have it set the project. Obviously.

Repeat, ad infinitum.

I use disabled rules with no actions to group the rules in the rule list, for instance, I go --- Spam Rules --- followed by --- Bacn Rules ---, and then --- Personal Rules ---, --- Location Rules --- and finally --- Project Rules ---, but do what you want. I'm not the boss of you.

The critical piece of the puzzle here is not the hours and hours you spend on the front end setting all this idiocy up.

No, the critical piece is that if you get a message in your Inbox, and it requires no intervention, action, caring, loving or even emotional indifference, figure out what rule it should be caught by, and add the sender to the right group. IF THERE IS NO GROUP OR RULE, MAKE ONE.

Yes, I now have a group, rule and smart mailbox called "Family". And I can look at those after work. Or on the weekend.

Also, if you ARE using email aliases, say through .me, set up rules for those too ... Use as much of the message metadata as you can to make sure that your inbox remains as EMPTY as possible.

For the messages that DO end up in your inbox, if you can't immediately deal with it, find one of the 5 @ tags, tag it, and move it out of the inbox. Come back and review it later that afternoon. Or the next day. Rands wrote about this recently. I go through my @action folder twice a day, @waiting about once every day or two, @hold every few days, @respond once a day and @review about once a day.

When you do this, make sure you can devote 15 or 20 minutes, clear out the low hanging fruit, re-prioritize and retag the remaining messages in that box, and move on.

Loading mentions Retweet

Comments [0]

Sidezooming and the Caldecott Tunnel

We live less than a mile from the tunnel in this article: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/03/magazine/03traffic-t.html?_r=1&scp=1&sq=side%20zoomer&st=cse&oref=slogin

The Elegant Universe side of me loves zipper merges. The DC native and newly minted Californian driver in me distrusts all those drivers.

Loading mentions Retweet

Comments [0]

Fixing (or just cleaning) Mail.app

Ignoring all the rest of the crap I'd accumulated over the years, Mail was a bit of a disaster.

First I had my .Mac account. Then my BBBB account (more on this later). Finally, there was the vast accumulation of personal domains, gmail and yahoo accounts, plus my Cornell account.

So the first thing I did? Got rid of everything not a work or personal account. That means you either reach me through .Mac or .BBBB, or not at all. Eventually I may bring back a couple of the personal domains, but for now, I really don't care.

Since .Mac is my main personal account, the next step was getting proper rules set up. So I've got a couple of alias addresses set up - initials, initials-spam, craptacular-shite-mail-for-bug@mac.com, etc. This way I can color and filter them, and I NEVER use my main account to sign up for anything.

Next, MailTags and Mail Act-On. I think Scott Morrison is looking in the $20-$30 range for both. They're worth $100. Buy them, use them. Stop trying to organize mail. Just have rules set up to automatically tag them, and Act-On rules to allow simple manual tagging, and then just use Smart Mailboxes as needed. I have one mailbox other than Inbox. Zenbox is where ALL mail goes. If it shows up in my Inbox, its either something that needs actual attention, or something that needs a new rule (or the address added to an existing rule group).

I use Mailtags for really only one purpose, although I've got dozens of tags defined: @action/@hold/@review/@respond/@waiting status, or ongoing projects. For instance, selling my condo @ 3303 Water Street gets an Address Book group: ~3303 Water Street. Anyone involved in this gets an address card added to that group. The mail rule says anyone sending mail to me from that group gets automatically project-tagged as ~3303waterstreet, and moved to Zenbox. Then, to close the loop, there's a smart mailbox called, yep, ~3303 Water Street that pulls any messages with that project set.

The @* tags can be set programatically via rules, or manually via Act-On. Incoming Amazon sending-your-package messages get tagged @waiting, and cleared when the package shows up. Messages from people that need a response? Yep. @respond. Something I want to deal with soon? @action. Something I want to deal with later, or more to the point, wait for someone else to deal with? @hold.

In ALL cases, once tagged, they get moved out of my Inbox to the Zenbox.

As a system, this works pretty well.

So I lied, also. I have a second mailbox. This is called Bbox. Unfortunately, BBBB IT has a somewhat regressive, or "Communist" policy about mailboxes. That is, I have 400MB of drive space for email. This is the same as the newest BBBB employee. The biggest difference? I, in theory, could have 10 years of email. I don't, for two reasons: 1) BBBB IT deleted most of 2000-2002 during the great email purge of 2003, or "crash" as some like to call it, and 2) I delete a lot of crap.

Even still, there is NO way for me to keep everything relevant, and so things that are either non-business critical or no longer meet the definition of MNPI are encrypted and transferred to my .Mac account, which for $99 a year gives me 40GB of mail storage.

N.B. Dear BBBB IT, I will happily take a $100 a year pay cut for 40 GB of mail storage space. Or even, say, 5GB.

Ok, so, here I am officially consolidating mail from 6 (yes 6) offline Outlook PST files, plus my 25GB .mbox files. And I end up with a lot of duplicates. So yes, I spent a couple hours a night for almost 3 weeks cleaning, writing code to do duplicate detection, running said duplicate detection, giving up and using Mail Scripts, etc etc etc.

In the end, I'm down to 15GB of mail, organized in three mailboxes across two servers: critical business mail and MNPI in a single Bbox mailbox on the BBBB servers. Personal mail in a single Zenbox mailbox on .Mac. And 29000 non-critical, non-MNPI, lots of years old mail in a Bbox mailbox on .Mac.

Does it violate IT policy? Absolutely. So do the following:

The packet sniffer I run to track down issues between JIRA and Peoplesoft. Also, an awesome bug in IE.
The fact that ALL of what I do is on personal hardware. N.b. again, IT, when you want to get me an 8-core 16GB Mac Pro, I'm willing to use your hardware.

Loading mentions Retweet

Comments [1]

Digital Lifestyle Maintenance

Hm. That's close to the right title. HOLY FUCK I HAVE A LOT OF CRAP is a bit over the top. The point here is twofold: I have a lot of digital information that seems to have accumulated over the years, and I have a lot of non-digital information that I certainly don't care about having the atoms for.

So first we packed the house and I burned out a $200 shredder getting rid of things that REALLY didn't matter. Then we moved to California. Then I unpacked my office. Then I bought a 140-lb workgroup shredder to keep my cubic-meter block of an HP Color LaserJet company. Seriously, this shredder can take whole SQUIRRELS and not blink. Haven't tried bigger meat yet.

So now I've got this shredder, and a filing cabinet full of paper that I will NEVER look at again, but somehow seems important (Thanks Dad, for giving me my tax returns from 1984.)

So I bought a network attached scanner. In the grand scheme of things, its a bit wimpy. 8 scanned pages a minute. I def. need to find a good Canon or Xerox workgroup copier and plug that thing in, but for now, its doing the trick.

I also wish the shredder had a page counter. I think I'm well upwards of 3-4K pages.

So the moral of this story is this, and it has nothing to do with shredders. If I'm going to be keeping all this stuff, I ALSO need to get rid of the stuff I don't need that is already digital.

For instance, 320x240 rips of Simpsons clips from 2001? Um, I own the box sets. I'll rip the whole DVD instead! Delete.

There have been some casualties. Safari, for one. I don't like Firefox, and in fact use delicious2safari to make sure my bookmarks come back to be able to get to the phone, but i DO love tagging. Safari bookmark management is dreadful. So I did what anyone would have. I dumped my 3500 bookmarks ranging back to 1998 into delicious.com (neƩ del.icio.us, yes, its feminine), sorted, deleted, tagged and otherwise managed them down to about 200 that are actually still relevant, and then d2s'd them back into Safari, which keeps the folksonomy intact.

Wait 'til I get to the whole sorting my Mail posting. That one was fun :)

Loading mentions Retweet

Comments [1]

On our way to Point Isabel

And then the Tokyo Fish Market. I love the Bay Area.

Loading mentions Retweet

Comments [0]